Category: Technology

  • Things I don’t miss

    I was recently talking to a former colleague who was complaining about dealing with the Finance department. My first reaction was, “I don’t miss that”. My next reaction was, “you know what else I don’t miss? Having to wear socks”.

    Which of course led me to think about all the things I really, really do not miss about corporate software development. So, in no particular order, here are ten things that I really do not miss.

    1. Having to work inside on a beautiful day.
    2. Mediocre colleagues
    3. Really lame colleagues
    4. CYA (this should probably be #1)
    5. Conference calls that are not useful (if you are saying to yourself, “there’s no other kind” you haven’t worked with a team of four really smart people).
    6. Time tracking
    7. Decisions that take longer than five minutes
    8. Socks. (seriously, other than for running, weddings, or funerals, I haven’t worn socks since April).
    9. Long pants (see #9).
    10. Any activity that doesn’t lead to better software (other than drinking, which occasionally still does)

    I’m sure there are more. I do miss people, but just specific people (see #2 and #3).

  • Just cool…

    … to see images of a nebula 7000 light years away.

    I haven’t tried the 149MB high res download…

  • “Free” Business model

    Here’s a good brief discussion of “free” as a business model (with lots of good links like this).

  • Geek Skills

    How many of the “100 Essential Skills for Geeks” do you have?

    For the record, I can recite Monty Python and the Holy Grail pretty much start to finish…

  • Outlook vs. Thunderbird

    With money tight, I had been going largely open source with software. Instead of Outlook, I’ve been using Thunderbird. But since Origami Risk is part of Microsoft’s BizSpark program, we get Microsoft software for free.

    With the cost objection gone, I have been slowly coming back to the dark side (MS Office, that is). I needed to test Word and Excel because Origami reports export to those formats (among others) and using OpenOffice wasn’t a valid test. I love OneNote, so I’m back using that for meeting notes (Evernote was OK but not as nice).

    But I didn’t have any real complaint with Thunderbird. So I kept it for a long time.

    Today I installed Outlook 2007 to give it a spin. My first reaction was, “damn it’s slow”. Then I went to sync up my Google calendar and contacts. Ouch.

    In Outlook you can have an “internet calendar”. Cool, just like Thunderbird. But in Outlook it’s read only. So you could view your Google calendar, but not add to it. Google does have a sync tool for Outlook, so that’s a better option.

    But Thunderbird (with the Lightning calendar add-on) simply works as a Google calendar client. It works with regular Google (my personal calendar) and Google apps (Origami Risk calendar). You could argue that there is a downside to that if I have no internet connection, but overall I think it’s preferable.

    Thunderbird certainly isn’t pretty. It doesn’t do Tasks as well as Outlook. Did I mention that Outlook is slow? I never really noticed it when I used it all the time, but after using Thunderbird it seems really pokey.

    I’m going to play with both for a while. I may go back to the dark side, but so far I’m leaning open source…

  • Dress Code

    With nice weather, I’m really starting to appreciate working for myself. My current dress code is shorts and sandals. My current office location is a garden on a 72 degree sunny day.

    Strong WiFi and a strong battery are key…

  • Browser conundrum

    I’m finding myself using Chrome more and more. It is just so much faster than Firefox. But I miss the add-ins. I’m a big TwitterFox user and just having the five day weather forecast on the bottom of my browser is really nice.

    So I go back and forth, Chrome, Firefox, Chrome, Firefox. And just for kicks I added Bing as my Firefox search engine. I’ll start comparing Bing and Google.

    But Bing hasn’t indexed OrigamiRisk.com yet…

  • Anti-Vac, Blogs and Jenny McCarthy

    I’m a science guy, so I like the science blogs. One of my favorites has been Phil Plait at Bad Astronomy. I’ve actually become a bit annoyed at his blog because he rants so much against the anti-vaccine crowd. I guess I feel that this crowd has so few facts on their side that you don’t need to give them that much attention.

    But apparently I’m wrong. The anti-vaccine movement has a prominent spokesperson in Jenny McCarthy. She has a son with autism (perhaps cured?) and the anti-vaccine crowd blames autism on vaccines despite all evidence to the contrary. But she is, after all, living with Jim Carrey and he’s really, really funny. So she must know what she’s talking about.

    Are we all idiots?

    Jenny McCarthy is famous for (pardon my language) having nice tits. She posed for Playboy and did very well, getting named Playmate of the Year. She is clearly not stupid, and she turned that fame into an MTV career. She has performed in a fairly extensive list of really bad TV shows and movies.

    So clearly she is an expert on medicine.

    The science on vaccines causing autism has so completely been shot down it’s crazy. The anti-vac crowd initially blamed the mercury in vaccines (Thimerosal). But vaccines stopped using mercury in 2001 and the autism rate has continued to climb at the same pace. Denmark stopped using Thimerosal in 1992. Continued increase in autism. The original UK study on autism and vaccines has been rebuked by co-authors and it appears the data was fabricated (and the main author apparently in cahoots with lawyers looking to sue on behalf of parents of children with autism). 

    Hmm.

    Is anyone paying attention here?

    This would normally just be a case of people listening to the latest fad with no real consequence other than keeping magazines like People around. Stupid but harmless.

    But the truth is that people are taking this seriously and the level of non-vaccination is rising to dangerous levels. Children are actually dying of routine diseases due to lack of overall vaccinations.

    And yet we get our science education primarily from hot chicks.

    I’m all for hot chicks. But for entirely different reasons…